tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2156944512466583246.post8994541067841035189..comments2024-03-18T18:17:34.333+01:00Comments on Theropoda: Coming Soon: sauropodi giganti, spinosauri e carcharodontosauridi cinesi, due nuovi oviraptorosauri ed il mitico "Archaeopteryx Coreano"Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2156944512466583246.post-42370699762599168552010-02-07T13:38:06.481+01:002010-02-07T13:38:06.481+01:00Sorry for the delay, guys, I had lot's of work...Sorry for the delay, guys, I had lot's of work these last days and I went to the field yesterday. <br />Well, honestly I have to admit I don't have strong arguments to say this tooth does not belong to a spinosaurid. According to some people here, it does not look like a baryonychine tooth at all (cf. teeth from Suchomimus and Baryonyx that some of them have personally examined). As my Christophe Hendrickxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14252978164855691830noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2156944512466583246.post-45474889192608237222010-02-03T15:54:37.025+01:002010-02-03T15:54:37.025+01:00Interestingly (though obviously it depends on the ...Interestingly (though obviously it depends on the accuracy of the measurements and identifications) it's not the least compressed baryonchine tooth reported. With a compression index of 0.6, though pretty far down there, Sánchez-Hernandez et al. 2007 describe supposed baryonchine teeth even less conical in form, and Canudo et al. 2008 give measurements of several teeth very close (0.62 is Tor Bertinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05243812178214071957noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2156944512466583246.post-50169597757253905172010-02-03T11:18:24.314+01:002010-02-03T11:18:24.314+01:00Hi Christophe,
No, I'm not referring to t...Hi Christophe,<br /><br /> No, I'm not referring to that tooth (I cited it in the 26 January 2010 post), but to other new specimens.<br /><br /> Interesting. What is your interpretation of that tooth? I've always considered the "baryonychine tooth morphology" a grade and not a clade, that is , as "velociraptorine tooth morphology" may be non-dromaeosaurine Andrea Cauhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10855060597677361866noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2156944512466583246.post-19594436518226975282010-02-03T10:45:43.471+01:002010-02-03T10:45:43.471+01:00Hi Andrea,
If you referring to the new Baryonychi...Hi Andrea,<br /><br />If you referring to the new Baryonychinae tooth from the Upper Cretaceous of China, we all believe here in Lourinha that this is definitely not a Spinosauridae at all! It's even not conical...<br />C.Christophe Hendrickxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14252978164855691830noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2156944512466583246.post-50048438461975146852010-02-03T09:12:59.588+01:002010-02-03T09:12:59.588+01:00Sounds great... waiting for it! ^^Sounds great... waiting for it! ^^Pakhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09428545779488560147noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2156944512466583246.post-36348169618580042862010-02-02T18:29:34.187+01:002010-02-02T18:29:34.187+01:00Sent you an email, Andrea.Sent you an email, Andrea.Tor Bertinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05243812178214071957noreply@blogger.com